Intel’s Core i9-10900Okay has been the topic of one other benchmark leak as we come nearer to its launch (preceded by a attainable unveiling on the finish of April), and this recent outcome might assist to calm fears that Comet Lake chips would possibly simply battle within the face of AMD’s Ryzen line-up.
The Geekbench 5 outcome was uncovered by Tum_Apisak, who’s the supply of lots of leaked benchmarks on Twitter.
Intel Core i9-10900KASRock Z490M Pro4Geekbench 5https://t.co/N1sa1Qb5pKfor comparei9-9900KShttps://t.co/dnurLWL9JRMarch 27, 2020
The incoming flagship Core i9-10900Okay managed to document a single-core results of 1,437, and in multi-core the CPU hit 11,390 (assuming this benchmark isn’t fabricated in some method, after all).
In comparison with the processor it would succeed, the Core i9-9900Okay, that’s a fairly appreciable increase – this hit 1,340 in single-core and eight,788 in multi-core (though not in an similar system, so now we have to bear that firmly in thoughts – there might have been totally different portions and spec of system reminiscence, for instance).
At any charge, by way of multi-core with this specific comparability, we’re an nearly 30% leap in efficiency with the incoming 10th-gen processor.
So sure, that’s spectacular, however then we’d count on the Comet Lake providing to outdo the earlier flagship, after all. The factor is that a number of the previous leaked benchmarks have indicated that we might not get that much of a relative boost, so this would seem to put paid to any of those fears (along with worries that Intel might be struggling to tame the power consumption of the 10900K, perhaps, as we’ve also heard on the grapevine).
As we get closer to the release of the processor, of course it makes sense that any leaked benchmark result would be more in line with the performance we might expect from the finished release version of the CPU (as opposed to engineering samples which are somewhat hampered due to being early versions of the silicon).
Getting more out of 14nm
Given that the 10900K has 25% more cores than the 9900K (10 versus 8), with no other factors coming to bear, you’d expect a roughly similar increase in multi-core performance – so the 30% figure shows that Intel has still been able to squeeze more out of its 14nm process. Of course, upping the maximum boost slightly from 5GHz to 5.1GHz (as per the rumor mill) would help in that regard, but may not entirely account for the extra horsepower, which is presumably due to Intel’s further refinements of 14nm with Comet Lake.
Refinements that must be increasingly difficult to make at this point, given how hard Intel has had to push 14nm (and for so long). Which is another reason why folks were somewhat concerned about the sort of performance we might get with 10th-gen desktop processors compared to current offerings.
Of course, all this remains speculation at this point, so we shouldn’t get carried away with any of this theorizing; but at least the latest indications are more positive than some of the previous buzz we’ve heard.
Intel needs to produce something special to help combat the success of Ryzen 3000 in the desktop arena, which has been storming ahead for AMD. And of course Ryzen 4000 isn’t too far away either, with even bigger potential gains for AMD, which might mean Intel could take action on the pricing front (it has been dropping CPU prices elsewhere in recent times, after all).
Running against that possibility is the fact that Intel isn’t known for coming in from the get-go with competitive pricing in a new product line, but as ever, we shall see when Comet Lake actually launches.
Via Tom’s Hardware